![audacity record multiple inputs audacity record multiple inputs](https://jamesmcallisteronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Normalizing-Audio-In-Audacity.jpg)
And since they are powered and so forth, they do add a source of noise into your recorded signal chain - if that matters to you.ĭepending on how many channels you want to record, you need to consider how many condenser microphones you will simultaneously record for separate processing in your software, as these need phantom power - The number of phantom powered channels in an audio interface is probably the main source of expense, as a general rule of thumb.
![audacity record multiple inputs audacity record multiple inputs](https://www.how2shout.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Joining-audio-with-Audacity-40-50.png)
I've been doing home recording that way for nearly 20 years - never had a mixer in the system. everything is ganged together.Īs others have said, it's not a necessity to use a mixer in between your signal sources and a multi-channel audio interface. remember that with just a L and a R you have no control over just the bass, just the piano, just the guitar. If you want to do any dubbing, redos of a section, etc. If you just record those many tracks mixed down to one left and one right into Audacity, you are cool with just Audacity running and you can mix the levels at the mixer. Then some kind of DAW software that will record multitrack input, unless you play in perfect tune, time and balance on the first take. $85-ish used on Craigslist or eBay.) And a bunch of patch cables, one per channel. That would required a fairly expensive interface card for your computer (I think it cost me like $175 used) amd a couple of hardware interfaces (MOTUs were fine for me, but the will do only 8 tracks of analog audio each, so you'll need at least 2. Somewhere in the bowels of these forums you will find a thread about my experiene with Mark of the Unicorn hardware. Is what you are doing recording a band in the room with everything running through your mixer and you want it to record on individual tracks?ĭo you have a credit card with a lot of room on it, because you are now talking about multi track capable hardware. If you want to record multi tracks where you mean laying track upon track upon track, we'd need to know more. Multi meaning left and right or multi meaning more than 2? What hardware do I need to connect my mixer to my computer to record live-recordings as multi-track? What hardware do I need to connect my mixer to my computer to record live-recordings as single-track? My computer is Windows 7 with USB connectors. This is just for rough-cut, live-to-tape, basic recording to capture jam-sessions and rehearsals for our own personal review- this is not for recording-studio-quality track-recording- this is just for live-recording and the only re-touching that I would want to do (if any) is to set volume levels so the parts are balanced in volume. Ideally, it would be nice to have a live-recording capability such that each instrument is saved on a separate track.
![audacity record multiple inputs audacity record multiple inputs](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ff/8f/4b/ff8f4b38425020330e1f98c3cd1afce8.png)
I definitely need at least live-recording capability such that all the instruments playing into the mixer get put on 1 track and pushed into Audacity.
![audacity record multiple inputs audacity record multiple inputs](https://virtuosocentral.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Connecting-Multiple-Mics-to-a-Computer-Using-an-Audio-Interface.jpg)
Of course, I need to stay within a tight budget here. and I am wondering if that is good enough. I found this audio-interface online at Amazon.īehringer UCA222 U-Control Ultra-Low Latency 2 In/2 Out USB Audio Interface with Digital Output And Massive Software Bundle and it suggests that I need an "audio interface" like this. I looking online and found this nice article. I want to know what hardware I need to get from that mixer to my computer and put the digital recording into Audacity or Reaper or something similar. which has 2 outputs, both 1/4", for L and R. I can't believe this functionality is fully supported by Helix hardware and software, yet the UX of configuring it is so abysmal.Behringer XENYX 1202FX Premium 12-Input 2-Bus Mixer Any block will do and the block can even be bypassed. Note: In order for the extra paths to not collapse you need to have a block on them. In addition, as always, you can record the dry mic and try guitar on USB 7/8. Now you're hardware-monitoring a mix of the mic and the guitar on your default output, say XLR, recording your processed guitar on the default USB 1/2, and recording the processed mic on USB 3/4. The second mic path send to whatever output you prefer to record just the mic on. This is because the default Multi also sends to USB 1/2, which we don't want. Then, on the first path - send the processed mic to whatever you're using for monitoring. But instead of splitting the input part, just do the output one. In order to achieve the monitoring and separate recording of guitar and mic, you need to split the mic path, like Scott is showing in the video. I just slightly adapted his findings for the microphone use case.